3 ms·
Do we know for sure what his intent was? Anyway, yes we can argue about the distinctions here, but I suspect we agree that for prosecutors rigidly to refuse to
by gruseom 14y ago
Do we know for sure what his intent was?
Anyway, yes we can argue about the distinctions here, but I suspect we agree that for prosecutors rigidly to refuse to consider any of them at all ("theft is theft") was abusive.
- tptacek 14y agoWe have some evidence, because he wrote a manifesto.
- gruseom 14y agoInterestingly, Lessig explicitly dismisses the theory that Swartz was trying to "liberate" the JSTOR archive: http://www.theatlantic.com/national/archive/13/01/aarons-law/267247/ http://www.theatlantic.com/national/archive/13/01/aarons-law...