4 ms·
I agree with you, but I don't know how much credit she'd receive for merely trying to eliminate law. We wouldn't need this massive, inconsistent, vague, and co
by ahallock 14y ago
I agree with you, but I don't know how much credit she'd receive for merely trying to eliminate law.
We wouldn't need this massive, inconsistent, vague, and convoluted law system if we just followed a few fundamental moral principles. An analogy would be the overly-complex equations to support the Earth being at the center of the solar system. When the sun was rightfully placed there, the equations became more elegant.
A programming analogy would be to refactor similar laws into a more general form, follow KISS, use open-source software (free market) instead of reinventing the wheel (the type of wheel you'd find in Death Race 2000, btw), etc. But just like the programmer who gets job security from tangled, inscrutable code, Statists and lawyers do so from law.
- rayiner 14y agoNo, the proper analogy is Windows, except 1000x more complex. The complexity of the Windows code doesn't exist because Microsoft profits from keeping it hard to understand.