4 ms·
A solution no one suggested is using a fingerprint scanner to login as they usually test against all possible local users, and are extremely convenient to use.
by rogerbinns 14y ago
A solution no one suggested is using a fingerprint scanner to login as they usually test against all possible local users, and are extremely convenient to use. Face scanners have similar properties.
There are certainly issues with them, and like all things security there are some tradeoffs to be made. Since the users are local, things are inherently less secure anyway (password entry can be observed, hardware keyloggers can be easily hidden, chances are you can boot a live CD and inject any software you want).
As an example my Lenovo laptop has fingerprint recognition and Android devices have face recognition.
- aaron695 14y agoMy understanding is you still need a username with fingerprints etc. Well at least in a corporate environment. So they don't change the original question What if the fingerprint algorithm overlaps two people. You suddenly can access someone else account without trying. IE fingerprints burnt off/similarly damaged through chemo. Also an fingerprint attack without username simultaneously attacks all users at once. Not saying with the right tech a fingerprint might be good enough without a username, but my understanding is it's not done and whether it can be is a similar question to the original question.
- rogerbinns 14y ago> My understanding is you still need a username with fingerprints etc. The fingerprint software (Lenovo's at least) scans all enrolled accounts. You do not select your user account - you just scan an enrolled finger and it figures out the correct user. > Well at least in a corporate environment. The original question wasn't asking about thousands of users but rather a small location (eg small office or a home). That said Lenovo's fingerprint software does support "enterprise" use where the signatures can be centrally stored and redistributed to relevant machines. Note that I would never use or advocate that. > What if the fingerprint algorithm overlaps two people. You suddenly can access someone else account without trying. Fingerprints are unique! The scanners are high resolution. Your fingerprints are always going to match your stored ones with the highest confidence. > fingerprints burnt off/similarly damaged through chemo You enroll multiple fingers. And yes someone with them completely damaged would have to revert to typing their password. > Also an fingerprint attack without username simultaneously attacks all users at once. You forgot the initial constraints. This is a local office/home where users have local access. Doing an attack via fingerprint is the hardest way of doing a compromise. As I pointed out you could just observe someone typing their password (directly or via a camera in the same room), you could plug a hardware keylogger in and no one is likely to see it, you could boot into a livecd and install attack software of your choice, and the list goes on. Heck you could probably just ask any of your family/coworkers for their passwords and they'd likely tell you!