2 ms·
When you say "because it is in my opinion that in fact X," what you've said is simply that "in your opinion X". I point that out because Aaron apparently had a
by politician 14y ago
When you say "because it is in my opinion that in fact X," what you've said is simply that "in your opinion X". I point that out because Aaron apparently had a different opinion that led him to make a different choice. I find it strange that posing a question which you and Aaron answer differently in order to probe your rational is "a total red herring".
I respect that you don't believe these laws are just. One such power that helps society push back against such laws is jury nullification - the right to for a jury to say "not guilty" regardless of what the law claims.
- anigbrowl 14y agoIt doesn't matter what aaronsw's opinion was; it's still illegal to break intoa w riing closet and attach our computer to someone else's network without permission. If you found someone doing that in a typical workplace, you'd call the cops too. I think my local library should be open 24/7 but that doesn't give me the right to remove the door by the hinges.
- tcuk 14y agopolitician, with respect I think you need to be more concise with your questions, I would hope Aaron would also say 'no' to the vague: 'Should you always plead guilty to crimes the Government accuses you of?' Did you perhaps mean to ask: 'Should you always plead guilty to crimes the Government accuses you of, even when you believe you are right?' Which is still a red herring because it doesn't address the issue: Did Aaron truly believe he broke no current laws, or did he believe so strongly the laws were bullshit, so he shouldn't be prosecuted at all? (which means he still actually broke them)
- deleted 14y ago[deleted]
- BrokenPipe 14y agotrespassing maybe. Not any serious bulling plus 13 counts. Are you not the troll from early today ? How many accounts is that ?