7 ms·

Stuff (2007)

127 points by gatsby 14y ago

HardyLeung 14y ago
Gotta watch this: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MvgN5gCuLac http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MvgN5gCuLac
- cschep 14y ago
  ... and a book!
danielweber 14y ago
I wonder if video games warped my view. My characters in Ultima III could carry a practically unlimited amount of equipment, and the price for buying and selling was the same, so stuff was as good as cash if you were in a towne. In reality, it's very hard to sell random stuff yourself, especially if you want even a fraction of the "market price" someone would pay to get the equivalent object at the store.
- cschep 14y ago
  Definitely something I've had to realize as I got older. One of the lies that I tell myself is that I can buy new stuff because I can easily sell it a year later for so close to what I bought it for, I'd be a fool NOT to buy it! Apple products are the only things that this has been true for ultimately.. And honestly, having a laptop around enables me to make money so it's a no brainer.
- pm90 14y ago
  OTOH, Diablo had a very limited backpack.
pm90 14y ago
This is a great essay, especially a great timing for me. As a 22 year old graduate student, I've only just saved enough money (from my assistantship) to consider spending on leisure items (a portable gas range was particularly hard to say no to at a garage sale). I'm greatly comforted by his opinion on books though. I never sell my books (except really bad textbooks). So, I've already accumulated a somewhat large library. I was considering donating it to a library, but I'll think more about that now.
- jfoutz 14y ago
  I think stuff to facilitate experiential travel is ok. You have to go camping with that range though. Planning the trip, the trip, and reflecting on the trip provides far more happiness than the instant temporary gratification of a new thing. Not the greatest support for my argument, but there it is: http://www.cnn.com/2009/HEALTH/02/10/happiness.possessions/index.html http://www.cnn.com/2009/HEALTH/02/10/happiness.possessions/i...
- jff 14y ago
  I'll argue that you'll get more utility out of a portable gas range than out of almost any book randomly pulled from your shelf, or any 10 books. I could go to my bookshelf right now and probably select 20 books that I have never more than glanced through and quite honestly will likely never read. Maybe someday I'll find a burning need to refer to a VAX architecture manual, but if I want to go camp out even once or twice a year, the portable range would be more useful. Now, a portable gas range won't get you the massive HN/San Francisco cred you'll get from a house full of books, that's a given.
  - philwelch 14y ago
    I dunno. Camping can be pretty boring, you should probably bring something to read. A VAX architecture manual sounds interesting.
Julianhearn 14y ago
Love this, so so true. I've done rather well for myself financially and can buy most things I want, or thought I wanted, and now realise that rarely does stuff, beyond the essentials of life, bring much happiness. My recommendation is to spend more on experiences.
tjic 14y ago
Depending on how you look at it, I either own 20,000 plus five things, or just two plus five things. I'm exaggerating, but I've got a core point: There are two things that I spend a LOT of time on and get a lot of enjoyment from: * cooking * wood and metalworking I've got two meticulously organized sets of things that reflect that: * a great kitchen with all sorts of implements, frozen stocks, a hundred spices, etc. * a great workshop with all sorts of tools and supplies I keep those two areas perfectly organized, because this increases my enjoyment of them on a daily basis. ...and I have no desire to prune them. My workshop has a long tail: I may not need the #3 dental pick every month, but when I want it, I really really want it. So it's in a drawer with a label. I may use it just three times a year, but I use SOME long-tail item every day or two. Outside of my kitchen and shop, though, I abjure clutter. I own one coat, one sweater, five shirts, etc. I entirely agree with Paul that one of the biggest expenses is the mental expense of keeping things cataloged. My advice: if there's something you really enjoy that requires tools, get them and use them. ...but aside from that, yes, be a minimalist. My two cents.
- justincormack 14y ago
  Ah tools. Tools are not stuff. Well, not if you use them, and they are good quality.
- tlrobinson 14y ago
  I agree. Compartmentalizing things is key. I'm ok with having a toolbox with 50 tools in it. I'm not ok with having 50 tools scattered around my apartment.
- philwelch 14y ago
  I think it's fair to think of a toolbox, or a kit, or a kitchen as one thing just as you can think of a bookcase as one thing. The only time it's ten thousand things is when you move, and maybe not even then. Ever since college I've had a "fix it" crate filled with cables, toolboxes, a sewing kit, etc. and whenever I move, I just move the crate.
- zipdog 14y ago
  The "long tail" on tools is very true, and something that took me a while to learn. I used to think I could get away with a smaller toolset of more general tools, and to just 'wing it' by using them creatively to solve the problem. But tools are a bit like OO classes: its better to do one job completely right than a dozen jobs not quite right.
cottonseed 14y ago
I used to think books were special, too. Having thousands of books is expensive: they are literally expensive, you buy or build shelves for them, they take up a lot of space, they're extremely painful to move, you have to organize them, and you keep mental space for them -- I own this book, I don't own that one -- otherwise, you might as well not have them. You don't use them constantly. Moreover, you can get an instant electronic copy or a physical copy in minutes, or at most a day (Amazon prime). Also, you confuse quality (good) and fragility. Most of the stuff I have is very high quality, which is why I use it every day and I don't have to worry about it falling apart.
- jisaacstone 14y ago
  Exactly. Unless you make notes (most) books are instantly replaceable. I have one shelf of my absolute favourite books & dvds (so I can loan them out). Plus a kindle for everything else. The reality is knowledge is even cheaper than food these days, and books are backbreaking whenever you move. A rational cost/benefit analysis will tell you to rid yourself of books before clothes. A favourite shirt is nearly irreplaceable, a favourite book can be replaced in a day.
  - dasil003 14y ago
    Of course one big problem with going digital for books today is Amazon can erase your entire library quicker than a dandelion seed in a forest fire.
- dools 14y ago
  Yeah books are like kryptonite to a frequent mover. I got rid of all my books about 5 years ago except for 5 engineering and maths textbooks that I would like to have around if I ever have to try and rebuild society after the apocalypse :)
- tjic 14y ago
  > I used to think books were special, too. Having thousands of books is expensive: I almost added books as a third category above. A year ago I had 10,000 books. Now I have 5,000. It'd be nice to cut that in half every year for a few years. There's no reason I can't get it down to 500 or 1,000 WITH EASE.
deleted 14y ago
[deleted]
grecy 14y ago
After being in Central and South America for two years, the biggest shock upon retuning to North America was the amount of stuff people have, and how easy it is to buy. It blows my mind that most houses I drive past every day have two cars, a boat, an RV, a snow machine (or two), a quad, skis & snowboards and that's just what I can see when they have their garage door open in spring. Not only do people have lots of stuff, they have so much they have to pay people to store it for them (self-storage). I had completely forgotten about those, because they simply don't exist in places where people don't have excess stuff. I highly recommend getting out of the developed world for a while to get perspective on how much stuff everyone has.
- b_emery 14y ago
  I had some stuff in self-storage when I once went away for several months. Spending some time there made me want to get rid of all my stuff. It's a very strange and sad place. One could write a novel about it. It's a place of transitions, and I got the impression that most of the transitions were not for the better. Ever watch that show where they get people to bid on abandoned self storage lockers? It's so weird that people pay money to store a bunch of junk. Not that the people are weird, just that humans are wired in such a way that we'd pay $150 a month to store a comparable dollar amount of stuff, because of the way it makes us feel. Maybe it's to avoid the way it makes us feel to get rid of it. That's what people are paying for. So they're basically being held ransom by their stuff I guess.
the_economist 14y ago
The things you own come to own you. --Tyler Durden
timdellinger 14y ago
I'll make the obligatory comment mentioning the Hacker News custom of titling the submissions of older content with the date, generally like so: Stuff [2007]
coenhyde 14y ago
It's amazing how much stuff you can accumulate when you're not paying attention. I had so much stuff and it didn't help me at all. It only prevented me from moving when I wanted. So I recently sold all my stuff, threw out all the rest and moved country. I live a just as luxurious life as I did before. I just find solutions to stuff that doesn't require owning the physical goods. Keep in mind half of this stuff is only possible because i'm living in the US now. And the rest is pretty obvious. eg. - Rent a furnished apartment. - Use car sharing services - Buy ebooks instead of physical books - Use Netflix/Hulu instead of owning a tv - Use pdf digital signing software instead of owning a printer/scanner/fax And really the only physical things I need now are some clothes and my laptop.
- Volpe 14y ago
  To add to your qualification: you are living in the US AND you have money. I don't mean this as a criticism of you, but instead the minimilist movement in general: There is something self-indulgent about middle class, talking about how "cool" it is to throw away stuff, and be minimalistic... It's almost a statement about how privileged you are.
  - coenhyde 14y ago
    Yes i'm privileged now ... But I grew up in a shed and a caravan in regional QLD, Australia. Went to shitty public schools. Slowly I worked my way to Silicon Valley. It took a LOT of hard work running business in Australia to get the cash to move here. Life isn't fair. VERY few people are raised in a life privileged enough to move country. Your post makes me angry. You are privileged and you have no idea. You're on the goddamn internet. You have the opportunity to make a lot of money if you get your shit together. STFU
    - Volpe 14y ago
      > Your post makes me angry. You are privileged and you have no idea. You're on the goddamn internet. You have the opportunity to make a lot of money if you get your shit together. STFU Sorry to have upset you like that. I meant the comment as something to reflect on (I myself have thought "How can I be more minimal")... As a side note: Australia (in general) doesn't have 'shitty public schools'. If you were to compare its schools on a global scale. You were born into privilege and became more privileged. It is difficult to see it that way (as I'm sure things were never 'easy') but the "bottom" in Australia is much much much, higher than the bottom elsewhere in the world.
dools 14y ago
One sure fire way to cure stuff-itis is to move house a lot. I have moved at least every 2 years since I was 16 (I moved a lot before that, too but I wasn't in charge so I didn't really notice). EDIT: I'm 32 now In some cases I would live somewhere only 6 months, so I've moved a LOT. I am now completely allergic to stuff. I throw things out wantonly and refuse gifts. I buy things only when they are something I critically need, and even then I wait a while. There is not only the mental cost of stuff that PG mentions, but the cost of transportation, storage and disposal (a cost which has become much more significant - garbage tip costs in Australia seem to have gone up several orders of magnitude faster than everything else since I was a kid). I'm not sure if you can achieve a cure vicariously or if you actually have to go through the mentally scarring process of moving the same 12 old PCs that you'll freecycle one of these days through 8 houses, but try asking yourself "If I buy this now ... How would I feel about moving it?" EDIT: several typos (after moving off my mobile keyboard)
- philwelch 14y ago
  A lot of people just have a workaround--their parents have a house, so they'll stash all their stuff that they want to keep but don't actually use at their parents' house. The last laugh is on them, though--when their parents die, not only do they have to deal with all that stuff again, but also all their parents' stuff, and that can be the hardest stuff to worry about.
tych0 14y ago
Funny this was posted, I just came to this realization myself recently. I've always known it, but I didn't really /realize/ it until about two weeks ago. So, I've begun selling things on craigslist. I've made $147 so far, which doesn't seem like a lot, but it's probably the $147 I'll be most proud of earning this year. Stuff is generally like lines of code in software: writing it (acquiring it) is fun, but the real fun starts when you figure out how to delete it. A good refactoring with a net negative number of lines brings me great joy, just as getting rid of this stuff on craigslist has. In fact, it brings me so much joy that for the forseeable future, I have a new rule: if I buy something, I must figure out how to sell/recycle/trash something of equal or more mass. This will force me to physically reduce the amount of stuff in my life. Obviously, mass isn't a fantastic approximation, but neither is the number of lines of code.
kylec 14y ago
The amount of stuff you have is the difference between the amount of stuff you acquire and the amount of stuff you sell or discard. This essay does a pretty good job of covering the former, but the only mention of the latter is the following: And yet when I got back I didn't discard so much as a box of it. Throw away a perfectly good rotary telephone? I might need that one day. I wish this idea was expanded upon more. One of the contributing factors as to why poorer people tend to have more stuff is because the cost of discarding or selling and subsequently replacing stuff is higher than simply storing it. If you have a well-paying job or are otherwise independently wealthy, it's easy to throw away a $20 rotary phone because you know you can just go out and buy a new one without inconvenience. There's also the compunction against discarding something that still works or is still useful. For example, I know quite a few people that have old computers gathering dust because their owner has subsequently replaced them with faster machines, but hasn't discarded the old ones because they're still operable and might be useful for a side project or something. I'm not really sure what the solution to either of those things is. Perhaps we need some sort of market where stuff is more of a liquid commodity than it is now - if there's less of a financial penalty to selling and repurchasing, and if it's easier for perfectly good items to be sold for another's use, it might enable people to have the option to have less stuff.
- nlawalker 14y ago
  > some sort of market Garage sales! Seriously, though, garage sales exist because most stuff is so cheap and disposable to begin with that if you tried to sell it for what someone would actually pay for it, you'd be lucky to break even after any shipping, transaction fees and the value of any personal time/effort you put into the process. So, you have a garage sale: you sell it (or at least show it) in all bulk, all at once to minimize effort, with zero transaction or shipping fees. Of course, making the effort to visit a garage sale has a non-negligible cost for the (potential) buyer. There are already thriving markets for stuff that's not cheap and disposable - electronics/phones, recreational/sports equipment, furniture, cars, etc. As for the compunction against discarding something that still works, my solution is to donate it to Goodwill (whatever you do, don't throw it away if it's "perfectly good") and take it as a lesson learned - think harder before buying this item, or an item like it, again.
philwelch 14y ago
It's all well and good to minimize the amount of stuff you accumulate, but I wonder how you handle having kids. Children are natural hoarders--I can't remember a single Christmas where I didn't want more and bigger toys. I spent almost as much time flipping through Lego catalogs fantasizing about playing with the biggest and most elaborate Lego sets as I spent playing with my actual Legos. Sure, you can just get your kids less toys, but then your kids have friends who have more toys and they pick up this kind of greed as a consequence of that. Is minimalism something kids can learn, or is it something you have to mature into? On another note, my parents passed away awhile back, and the single most overwhelming day-to-day challenge was how much stuff they had, which in effect meant how much stuff I had. It didn't really hit me all at once, though, since every single object was its own epiphany. By no voluntary effort of my own, I own a chainsaw! A shotgun! A bookshelf filled with deranged right-wing books! A C-band satellite dish! Another chainsaw! Another shotgun! Fortunately, there's such a thing as an "estate sale" where other people will actually come in and sell all of your stuff out of your house for you. All you have to do is go through and pick out the things you actually want to keep, as well as papers and photographs. The trick to this is, you don't actually have to be dead to have an estate sale, although you probably need to have so much stuff that it's worthwhile to take the time whitelisting the possessions you want to keep rather than blacklisting the ones you don't want to keep. Ironically, this only exists on the backs of the hoarders pg writes about. You can get amazing deals on "perfectly good" stuff at estate sales. The papers and photographs alone, though, can be overwhelming. Easily most of the stuff I kept were papers and photos. [1] I could justify all the advances ever made in computing simply by looking at an attic full of papers and photographs and contemplating the fact that they would all fit in my hand were they digitized. [1] The rest were either items of genuine sentimental value or--my own weakness--"perfectly good" "vintage" computers, including a pair of NeXTs! If anyone here knows of a good Apple museum, by the way, please email me, because I don't want my attic to be it.
- jiggy2011 14y ago
  When I was a child I used to fawn over toy catalogs too, until I got a computer.
- rthomas6 14y ago
jpdoctor 14y ago
> Books are more like a fluid than individual objects. It's not especially inconvenient to own several thousand books, Only thing I disagree with in this essay (I have many many bookcases that have gone back and forth across the US multiple times.) I am quite jealous of the younger gen: Their bookcases will be an iPad.
- grecy 14y ago
  Why move them around when you could just borrow them from the local library?
  - jpdoctor 14y ago
    The local library doesn't have my collection of tech books (semiconductor physics, circuit design, math math and more math, physics, physics, and more physics...)
    - grecy 14y ago
      And they won't get them in for you? When a book is requested at my local library they'll either purchase it to add to the lib catalog, or they'll borrow it from any other library in the country that has it so I can borrow it.
      - jpdoctor 14y ago
        > And they won't get them in for you? Perhaps, but they don't live on startup time. Or perhaps I'm an impatient beast. Both are possible.
        grecy 14y ago
        Right on. Interestingly, I've always found impatience to be a huge factor in stuff accumulation. i.e. Can't wait for something-or-other, so just buy it.
jsvaughan 14y ago
I was 50/50 on posting this, because contrary to the point of the article it wouldn't work if stuff was universally valueless, but I made FreelyWheely (http://www.freelywheely.com http://www.freelywheely.com) precisely as a means of getting rid of completely usable but, to me, less than worthless stuff. What I have discovered is that there are some things that are almost universally worthless (e.g. CRT tvs and monitors), not so surprising, but there are also a lot of people out there who really are quite desperate for very basic things, front yard full of cars or not.
robrenaud 14y ago
Replace every occurrence of stuff with shit and the article works even better.
nostromo 14y ago
In 2007 I would have agreed with pg regarding books being different. In 2013, I've gotten rid of all but maybe two dozen books with sentimental value.
- grecy 14y ago
  I couldn't agree more. Books are big, heavy and don't hold much value#. They cost a lot to store and a lot to move from place to place. I got rid of almost all mine, and now use the local library extensively, which is very enjoyable. # Unless you have a signed first ed. or something, in which case you're collecting antiques, not books
  - flyinRyan 14y ago
    I just switched to ebooks. Now there's no weight problem, no space problem. I can't sell them, but as you said; they didn't hold value anyway.
- thorum 14y ago
  I went through the same transition, but only because e-readers were invented.
- gatsby 14y ago
  Similar story here. I used to own several hundred books but decided to pare down to about 20 over the last few years. Aside from making moving a breeze, the best part is that my favorite books are now conversation pieces for my friends/visitors and I. People come over and immediately dive into my coffee table books about SF's architectural history and will usually mention something about one of the biographies I have on a shelf nearby.
- dennisgorelik 14y ago
  Even back in 2007 I knew pretty well that books are no better than any other stuff. But it does not end there. Pure information (stored in the cloud or wherever) is also "stuff" and should be constantly cleaned. Keeping pure information does not cost as much as physical stuff, but it still has quite some overhead: you have to index it, back it up, remember how to access it etc.
alok-g 14y ago
A common thing I find many people don't realize is that they accumulate too much stuff, find their home is too small, and then move to a bigger home. They are accumulating stuff often thinking they are saving money (e.g. buy wholesale from Costco), or not throw old stuff that still has some future utility to them. The money they are subconsciously paying just for the space for these things may actually be more than their worth.
taeric 14y ago
I have a hard time getting past the "poor people have more stuff" idea in the beginning. This is akin to thinking that rich people are cleaner. My observation is just that rich people have help. I'd be highly curious to know if there are good numbers into these claims.
- gatsby 14y ago
  I ran a quick search for articles or data to support pg's idea but couldn't find any. I'm wondering if, on average, "rich" and "poor" people have a similar amount of stuff/junk, but the rich have higher-quality junk and more room to spread it out so it looks cleaner or more minimalist.
  - taeric 14y ago
    Pretty much my thoughts. If you ever find anything on this, I'd be interested.
- lmm 14y ago
  When you're poor you have to be more risk-averse. You can't afford to follow the recommendations of many people here and throw out everything you think you probably won't need, then re-buy the stuff you actually need. Even something trivial like the rotary telephone he mentions - if you ever needed a new phone you could get a new one for $10, which to you or me is nothing, but could be a lot if you're poor. I'd also be interested to see better numbers, but the observation seems to make sense.
  - taeric 14y ago
    Apologies for missing this while this article was live. Not sure if you'll see my response. My assertions are A) more that richer people generally just have more than they realize, and B) having help decluttering is huge. It is easy to have the appearance of less stuff when you have a 5 bedroom house. Or, multiple houses. Not so much when you live in a 2 bedroom apartment. Similarly, if you can hire cleaners, it is not shocking that you can stay clean. Even relatively inexpensive cleaners. ($50 every two weeks, for instance. Easily doable for anyone wiling to drop cable. So, not exactly reserved for the super rich.)
durkie 14y ago
my rule to my family at christmas: don't get me anything i can't eat. telling relatives "don't get me anything" never ends up working, so if they're going to get me something, at least it will be delicious.
rodrigoavie 14y ago
Loved this essay. I think pg nailed it when he said that after some point, it's like you don't own stuff anymore. They own you. And the stuff we keep may become serious dependency in our life, which reduces our flexibility and freedom to do new stuff. I just read this article, glad I did in a point of my life where it really makes a huge difference.
damonpace 14y ago
I grew up in the back of a junkyard and watched my father collect "stuff" my entire life. It's a minor mental disorder, irrationally rooted in a fear of having nothing. To my father it was his security blanket. He would look out across the junkyard and see money. Everyone else would just see junk. As long as my father had something in the yard, he felt financially safe. Junk can't fire you and no one was going to steal it. (Only tweekers steal junk) Try stealing a broken down steam roller or a 1 ton gold smelting machine or a 10mb hard drive so big it had wheels. It's pointless. To my father, everything had value, but to everyone else it was just junk. The only people who ever purchased anything were other junk collectors. Watching this as a child and eventually as an adult, I've put the collection of "stuff" on a 10 point scale. 1 being a pure minimalist and 10 being an extreme horder. We all fit somewhere on that scale. I'm probably a 3 or 4. My father is a 10. Understanding where you are on this scale is important to de-cluttering your life. Sometimes value gets set by factors other than price. Value & price are not equally correlated. Value can be translated as functionality, prestige, vanity, security, companionship, etc. People get value of things beyond price and each person sees a different value for each product based on their psychological needs. All PG seems to be saying is to question an objects value before you purchase it. Otherwise, you could end up with a house full of junk that you and no one else will ever use again. In other words...Question everything, including value.
platz 14y ago
http://video.reboot.dk/video/486788/bruce-sterling-reboot-11 http://video.reboot.dk/video/486788/bruce-sterling-reboot-11 "Four variety of items: Beautiful things; emotionally important things; tools, devices and appliances that efficiently perform some useful function; and category four, everything else." http://www.wired.com/beyond_the_beyond/2011/02/transcript-of-reboot-11-speech-by-bruce-sterling-25-6-2009/ http://www.wired.com/beyond_the_beyond/2011/02/transcript-of...
saurabh 14y ago
George Carlin also had something to say about "stuff". http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MvgN5gCuLac http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MvgN5gCuLac
deleted 14y ago
[deleted]
peterjamescain 14y ago
reading that piece made me think of an article that I came across a while ago, about a photographer who went around rural China convincing people to cart all their 'stuff' outside their home and would take a photo of it all...amazing to see their life possessions on display; http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/magazine-19648095 http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/magazine-19648095
wensing 14y ago
I've moved 7 times in 9 years and figure I've discarded, given away or sold over 2,500 lbs worth of stuff. Crazy when I think of it this way. Feels great.
wensing 14y ago
I disagree with his assertion that clutter doesn't bother kids as much as adults. My kids always play more contentedly for longer periods after we've done a big purge or simply organized their toys. I think they get overwhelmed but don't know how to articulate it.
trustfundbaby 14y ago
It really comes to a thing that my folks taught me about money. Don't buy something unless you've wanted it three times --- Larry Wall
krrrh 14y ago
My favorite hack to avoid buying stuff that I really don't need is to photograph it in the store with my phone. I tell myself that I need to look into the product reviews when I get home to my computer, and the photograph is a reminder and documentation of the price and model. If it checks out ill come back and buy it. 95% of the time I've completely forgotten about it when I get home. Also, obligatory Geeorge Carlin bit on stuff: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JLoge6QzcG http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JLoge6QzcG
acchow 14y ago
Do any other software engineers here (who rent) have almost nothing outside clothing, laptop and smartphone?
SeppoErviala 14y ago
Attitudes toward stuff change slowly because you learn them from your parents. My grandmother used to save everything starting from plastic bags, strings, plastic food containers, used nails and screws to electricity, water, heat and money. I suspect it is because when she was young there was a serious lack for everything from food to building materials. I can see the same attitude in my parents except that they hoard a bit more expensive stuff like books, tools, electronics, music containers and furniture. I used to collect electronics, music, comic books and MTG-cards but at some point I just stopped. The need to collect more stuff that I had learned from my elders wasn't useful anymore. It is also apparent that some companies are trying to market and exploit this behaviour for their own gain. I still own too much stuff to fit in my apartment. I find it extremely hard to throw away 'perfectly good' stuff if I feel that it could be useful to someone. Yet it is quite laborious to sell it or to find someone who needs it.
solarbunny 14y ago
If a cluttered desk signs a cluttered mind, of what then is an empty desk a sign? / A. Einstein
mathattack 14y ago
It's interesting how close his comments are to Fight Club. :-) From http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0137523/quotes http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0137523/quotes "Man, I see in fight club the strongest and smartest men who've ever lived. I see all this potential, and I see squandering. God damn it, an entire generation pumping gas, waiting tables; slaves with white collars. Advertising has us chasing cars and clothes, working jobs we hate so we can buy shit we don't need. We're the middle children of history, man. No purpose or place. We have no Great War. No Great Depression. Our Great War's a spiritual war... our Great Depression is our lives. We've all been raised on television to believe that one day we'd all be millionaires, and movie gods, and rock stars. But we won't. And we're slowly learning that fact. And we're very, very pissed off. " Does this mean that the first rule of Hacker News is nobody talks about Hacker News? But seriously, the movie (and Paul's article) hits a nerve because we are indeed consumed by our stuff. There is a carrying cost for everything - every idea in our head, every physical item, every piece of clothes. Similar to what others have said, going abroad helped me realize how little I really need. I remember shipping all these boxes with me, only to not open most of them after I arrived. If I didn't think of something back home in storage over 6 months, would I ever need it? But it's still hard to avoid the weight of possessions.

Stuff (2007)

127 points by gatsby 14y ago

HardyLeung 14y ago

Gotta watch this: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MvgN5gCuLac http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MvgN5gCuLac

cschep 14y ago
... and a book!

danielweber 14y ago

I wonder if video games warped my view. My characters in Ultima III could carry a practically unlimited amount of equipment, and the price for buying and selling was the same, so stuff was as good as cash if you were in a towne. In reality, it's very hard to sell random stuff yourself, especially if you want even a fraction of the "market price" someone would pay to get the equivalent object at the store.

cschep 14y ago
Definitely something I've had to realize as I got older. One of the lies that I tell myself is that I can buy new stuff because I can easily sell it a year later for so close to what I bought it for, I'd be a fool NOT to buy it! Apple products are the only things that this has been true for ultimately.. And honestly, having a laptop around enables me to make money so it's a no brainer.
pm90 14y ago
OTOH, Diablo had a very limited backpack.

pm90 14y ago

This is a great essay, especially a great timing for me. As a 22 year old graduate student, I've only just saved enough money (from my assistantship) to consider spending on leisure items (a portable gas range was particularly hard to say no to at a garage sale). I'm greatly comforted by his opinion on books though. I never sell my books (except really bad textbooks). So, I've already accumulated a somewhat large library. I was considering donating it to a library, but I'll think more about that now.

jfoutz 14y ago
I think stuff to facilitate experiential travel is ok. You have to go camping with that range though. Planning the trip, the trip, and reflecting on the trip provides far more happiness than the instant temporary gratification of a new thing. Not the greatest support for my argument, but there it is: http://www.cnn.com/2009/HEALTH/02/10/happiness.possessions/index.html http://www.cnn.com/2009/HEALTH/02/10/happiness.possessions/i...
jff 14y ago
I'll argue that you'll get more utility out of a portable gas range than out of almost any book randomly pulled from your shelf, or any 10 books. I could go to my bookshelf right now and probably select 20 books that I have never more than glanced through and quite honestly will likely never read. Maybe someday I'll find a burning need to refer to a VAX architecture manual, but if I want to go camp out even once or twice a year, the portable range would be more useful. Now, a portable gas range won't get you the massive HN/San Francisco cred you'll get from a house full of books, that's a given.
- philwelch 14y ago
  I dunno. Camping can be pretty boring, you should probably bring something to read. A VAX architecture manual sounds interesting.

Julianhearn 14y ago

Love this, so so true. I've done rather well for myself financially and can buy most things I want, or thought I wanted, and now realise that rarely does stuff, beyond the essentials of life, bring much happiness. My recommendation is to spend more on experiences.

tjic 14y ago

Depending on how you look at it, I either own 20,000 plus five things, or just two plus five things. I'm exaggerating, but I've got a core point: There are two things that I spend a LOT of time on and get a lot of enjoyment from: * cooking * wood and metalworking I've got two meticulously organized sets of things that reflect that: * a great kitchen with all sorts of implements, frozen stocks, a hundred spices, etc. * a great workshop with all sorts of tools and supplies I keep those two areas perfectly organized, because this increases my enjoyment of them on a daily basis. ...and I have no desire to prune them. My workshop has a long tail: I may not need the #3 dental pick every month, but when I want it, I really really want it. So it's in a drawer with a label. I may use it just three times a year, but I use SOME long-tail item every day or two. Outside of my kitchen and shop, though, I abjure clutter. I own one coat, one sweater, five shirts, etc. I entirely agree with Paul that one of the biggest expenses is the mental expense of keeping things cataloged. My advice: if there's something you really enjoy that requires tools, get them and use them. ...but aside from that, yes, be a minimalist. My two cents.

justincormack 14y ago
Ah tools. Tools are not stuff. Well, not if you use them, and they are good quality.
tlrobinson 14y ago
I agree. Compartmentalizing things is key. I'm ok with having a toolbox with 50 tools in it. I'm not ok with having 50 tools scattered around my apartment.
philwelch 14y ago
I think it's fair to think of a toolbox, or a kit, or a kitchen as one thing just as you can think of a bookcase as one thing. The only time it's ten thousand things is when you move, and maybe not even then. Ever since college I've had a "fix it" crate filled with cables, toolboxes, a sewing kit, etc. and whenever I move, I just move the crate.
zipdog 14y ago
The "long tail" on tools is very true, and something that took me a while to learn. I used to think I could get away with a smaller toolset of more general tools, and to just 'wing it' by using them creatively to solve the problem. But tools are a bit like OO classes: its better to do one job completely right than a dozen jobs not quite right.

cottonseed 14y ago

I used to think books were special, too. Having thousands of books is expensive: they are literally expensive, you buy or build shelves for them, they take up a lot of space, they're extremely painful to move, you have to organize them, and you keep mental space for them -- I own this book, I don't own that one -- otherwise, you might as well not have them. You don't use them constantly. Moreover, you can get an instant electronic copy or a physical copy in minutes, or at most a day (Amazon prime). Also, you confuse quality (good) and fragility. Most of the stuff I have is very high quality, which is why I use it every day and I don't have to worry about it falling apart.

jisaacstone 14y ago
Exactly. Unless you make notes (most) books are instantly replaceable. I have one shelf of my absolute favourite books & dvds (so I can loan them out). Plus a kindle for everything else. The reality is knowledge is even cheaper than food these days, and books are backbreaking whenever you move. A rational cost/benefit analysis will tell you to rid yourself of books before clothes. A favourite shirt is nearly irreplaceable, a favourite book can be replaced in a day.
- dasil003 14y ago
  Of course one big problem with going digital for books today is Amazon can erase your entire library quicker than a dandelion seed in a forest fire.
dools 14y ago
Yeah books are like kryptonite to a frequent mover. I got rid of all my books about 5 years ago except for 5 engineering and maths textbooks that I would like to have around if I ever have to try and rebuild society after the apocalypse :)
tjic 14y ago
> I used to think books were special, too. Having thousands of books is expensive: I almost added books as a third category above. A year ago I had 10,000 books. Now I have 5,000. It'd be nice to cut that in half every year for a few years. There's no reason I can't get it down to 500 or 1,000 WITH EASE.

deleted 14y ago

[deleted]

grecy 14y ago

After being in Central and South America for two years, the biggest shock upon retuning to North America was the amount of stuff people have, and how easy it is to buy. It blows my mind that most houses I drive past every day have two cars, a boat, an RV, a snow machine (or two), a quad, skis & snowboards and that's just what I can see when they have their garage door open in spring. Not only do people have lots of stuff, they have so much they have to pay people to store it for them (self-storage). I had completely forgotten about those, because they simply don't exist in places where people don't have excess stuff. I highly recommend getting out of the developed world for a while to get perspective on how much stuff everyone has.

b_emery 14y ago
I had some stuff in self-storage when I once went away for several months. Spending some time there made me want to get rid of all my stuff. It's a very strange and sad place. One could write a novel about it. It's a place of transitions, and I got the impression that most of the transitions were not for the better. Ever watch that show where they get people to bid on abandoned self storage lockers? It's so weird that people pay money to store a bunch of junk. Not that the people are weird, just that humans are wired in such a way that we'd pay $150 a month to store a comparable dollar amount of stuff, because of the way it makes us feel. Maybe it's to avoid the way it makes us feel to get rid of it. That's what people are paying for. So they're basically being held ransom by their stuff I guess.

the_economist 14y ago

The things you own come to own you. --Tyler Durden

timdellinger 14y ago

I'll make the obligatory comment mentioning the Hacker News custom of titling the submissions of older content with the date, generally like so: Stuff [2007]

coenhyde 14y ago

It's amazing how much stuff you can accumulate when you're not paying attention. I had so much stuff and it didn't help me at all. It only prevented me from moving when I wanted. So I recently sold all my stuff, threw out all the rest and moved country. I live a just as luxurious life as I did before. I just find solutions to stuff that doesn't require owning the physical goods. Keep in mind half of this stuff is only possible because i'm living in the US now. And the rest is pretty obvious. eg. - Rent a furnished apartment. - Use car sharing services - Buy ebooks instead of physical books - Use Netflix/Hulu instead of owning a tv - Use pdf digital signing software instead of owning a printer/scanner/fax And really the only physical things I need now are some clothes and my laptop.

Volpe 14y ago
To add to your qualification: you are living in the US AND you have money. I don't mean this as a criticism of you, but instead the minimilist movement in general: There is something self-indulgent about middle class, talking about how "cool" it is to throw away stuff, and be minimalistic... It's almost a statement about how privileged you are.
- coenhyde 14y ago
  Yes i'm privileged now ... But I grew up in a shed and a caravan in regional QLD, Australia. Went to shitty public schools. Slowly I worked my way to Silicon Valley. It took a LOT of hard work running business in Australia to get the cash to move here. Life isn't fair. VERY few people are raised in a life privileged enough to move country. Your post makes me angry. You are privileged and you have no idea. You're on the goddamn internet. You have the opportunity to make a lot of money if you get your shit together. STFU
  - Volpe 14y ago
    > Your post makes me angry. You are privileged and you have no idea. You're on the goddamn internet. You have the opportunity to make a lot of money if you get your shit together. STFU Sorry to have upset you like that. I meant the comment as something to reflect on (I myself have thought "How can I be more minimal")... As a side note: Australia (in general) doesn't have 'shitty public schools'. If you were to compare its schools on a global scale. You were born into privilege and became more privileged. It is difficult to see it that way (as I'm sure things were never 'easy') but the "bottom" in Australia is much much much, higher than the bottom elsewhere in the world.

dools 14y ago

One sure fire way to cure stuff-itis is to move house a lot. I have moved at least every 2 years since I was 16 (I moved a lot before that, too but I wasn't in charge so I didn't really notice). EDIT: I'm 32 now In some cases I would live somewhere only 6 months, so I've moved a LOT. I am now completely allergic to stuff. I throw things out wantonly and refuse gifts. I buy things only when they are something I critically need, and even then I wait a while. There is not only the mental cost of stuff that PG mentions, but the cost of transportation, storage and disposal (a cost which has become much more significant - garbage tip costs in Australia seem to have gone up several orders of magnitude faster than everything else since I was a kid). I'm not sure if you can achieve a cure vicariously or if you actually have to go through the mentally scarring process of moving the same 12 old PCs that you'll freecycle one of these days through 8 houses, but try asking yourself "If I buy this now ... How would I feel about moving it?" EDIT: several typos (after moving off my mobile keyboard)

philwelch 14y ago
A lot of people just have a workaround--their parents have a house, so they'll stash all their stuff that they want to keep but don't actually use at their parents' house. The last laugh is on them, though--when their parents die, not only do they have to deal with all that stuff again, but also all their parents' stuff, and that can be the hardest stuff to worry about.

tych0 14y ago

Funny this was posted, I just came to this realization myself recently. I've always known it, but I didn't really /realize/ it until about two weeks ago. So, I've begun selling things on craigslist. I've made $147 so far, which doesn't seem like a lot, but it's probably the $147 I'll be most proud of earning this year. Stuff is generally like lines of code in software: writing it (acquiring it) is fun, but the real fun starts when you figure out how to delete it. A good refactoring with a net negative number of lines brings me great joy, just as getting rid of this stuff on craigslist has. In fact, it brings me so much joy that for the forseeable future, I have a new rule: if I buy something, I must figure out how to sell/recycle/trash something of equal or more mass. This will force me to physically reduce the amount of stuff in my life. Obviously, mass isn't a fantastic approximation, but neither is the number of lines of code.

kylec 14y ago

The amount of stuff you have is the difference between the amount of stuff you acquire and the amount of stuff you sell or discard. This essay does a pretty good job of covering the former, but the only mention of the latter is the following: And yet when I got back I didn't discard so much as a box of it. Throw away a perfectly good rotary telephone? I might need that one day. I wish this idea was expanded upon more. One of the contributing factors as to why poorer people tend to have more stuff is because the cost of discarding or selling and subsequently replacing stuff is higher than simply storing it. If you have a well-paying job or are otherwise independently wealthy, it's easy to throw away a $20 rotary phone because you know you can just go out and buy a new one without inconvenience. There's also the compunction against discarding something that still works or is still useful. For example, I know quite a few people that have old computers gathering dust because their owner has subsequently replaced them with faster machines, but hasn't discarded the old ones because they're still operable and might be useful for a side project or something. I'm not really sure what the solution to either of those things is. Perhaps we need some sort of market where stuff is more of a liquid commodity than it is now - if there's less of a financial penalty to selling and repurchasing, and if it's easier for perfectly good items to be sold for another's use, it might enable people to have the option to have less stuff.

nlawalker 14y ago
> some sort of market Garage sales! Seriously, though, garage sales exist because most stuff is so cheap and disposable to begin with that if you tried to sell it for what someone would actually pay for it, you'd be lucky to break even after any shipping, transaction fees and the value of any personal time/effort you put into the process. So, you have a garage sale: you sell it (or at least show it) in all bulk, all at once to minimize effort, with zero transaction or shipping fees. Of course, making the effort to visit a garage sale has a non-negligible cost for the (potential) buyer. There are already thriving markets for stuff that's not cheap and disposable - electronics/phones, recreational/sports equipment, furniture, cars, etc. As for the compunction against discarding something that still works, my solution is to donate it to Goodwill (whatever you do, don't throw it away if it's "perfectly good") and take it as a lesson learned - think harder before buying this item, or an item like it, again.

philwelch 14y ago

It's all well and good to minimize the amount of stuff you accumulate, but I wonder how you handle having kids. Children are natural hoarders--I can't remember a single Christmas where I didn't want more and bigger toys. I spent almost as much time flipping through Lego catalogs fantasizing about playing with the biggest and most elaborate Lego sets as I spent playing with my actual Legos. Sure, you can just get your kids less toys, but then your kids have friends who have more toys and they pick up this kind of greed as a consequence of that. Is minimalism something kids can learn, or is it something you have to mature into? On another note, my parents passed away awhile back, and the single most overwhelming day-to-day challenge was how much stuff they had, which in effect meant how much stuff I had. It didn't really hit me all at once, though, since every single object was its own epiphany. By no voluntary effort of my own, I own a chainsaw! A shotgun! A bookshelf filled with deranged right-wing books! A C-band satellite dish! Another chainsaw! Another shotgun! Fortunately, there's such a thing as an "estate sale" where other people will actually come in and sell all of your stuff out of your house for you. All you have to do is go through and pick out the things you actually want to keep, as well as papers and photographs. The trick to this is, you don't actually have to be dead to have an estate sale, although you probably need to have so much stuff that it's worthwhile to take the time whitelisting the possessions you want to keep rather than blacklisting the ones you don't want to keep. Ironically, this only exists on the backs of the hoarders pg writes about. You can get amazing deals on "perfectly good" stuff at estate sales. The papers and photographs alone, though, can be overwhelming. Easily most of the stuff I kept were papers and photos. [1] I could justify all the advances ever made in computing simply by looking at an attic full of papers and photographs and contemplating the fact that they would all fit in my hand were they digitized. [1] The rest were either items of genuine sentimental value or--my own weakness--"perfectly good" "vintage" computers, including a pair of NeXTs! If anyone here knows of a good Apple museum, by the way, please email me, because I don't want my attic to be it.

jiggy2011 14y ago
When I was a child I used to fawn over toy catalogs too, until I got a computer.
rthomas6 14y ago

jpdoctor 14y ago

> Books are more like a fluid than individual objects. It's not especially inconvenient to own several thousand books, Only thing I disagree with in this essay (I have many many bookcases that have gone back and forth across the US multiple times.) I am quite jealous of the younger gen: Their bookcases will be an iPad.

grecy 14y ago
Why move them around when you could just borrow them from the local library?
- jpdoctor 14y ago
  The local library doesn't have my collection of tech books (semiconductor physics, circuit design, math math and more math, physics, physics, and more physics...)
  - grecy 14y ago
    And they won't get them in for you? When a book is requested at my local library they'll either purchase it to add to the lib catalog, or they'll borrow it from any other library in the country that has it so I can borrow it.
    - jpdoctor 14y ago
      > And they won't get them in for you? Perhaps, but they don't live on startup time. Or perhaps I'm an impatient beast. Both are possible.
      - grecy 14y ago
        Right on. Interestingly, I've always found impatience to be a huge factor in stuff accumulation. i.e. Can't wait for something-or-other, so just buy it.

jsvaughan 14y ago

I was 50/50 on posting this, because contrary to the point of the article it wouldn't work if stuff was universally valueless, but I made FreelyWheely (http://www.freelywheely.com http://www.freelywheely.com) precisely as a means of getting rid of completely usable but, to me, less than worthless stuff. What I have discovered is that there are some things that are almost universally worthless (e.g. CRT tvs and monitors), not so surprising, but there are also a lot of people out there who really are quite desperate for very basic things, front yard full of cars or not.

robrenaud 14y ago

Replace every occurrence of stuff with shit and the article works even better.

nostromo 14y ago

In 2007 I would have agreed with pg regarding books being different. In 2013, I've gotten rid of all but maybe two dozen books with sentimental value.

grecy 14y ago
I couldn't agree more. Books are big, heavy and don't hold much value#. They cost a lot to store and a lot to move from place to place. I got rid of almost all mine, and now use the local library extensively, which is very enjoyable. # Unless you have a signed first ed. or something, in which case you're collecting antiques, not books
- flyinRyan 14y ago
  I just switched to ebooks. Now there's no weight problem, no space problem. I can't sell them, but as you said; they didn't hold value anyway.
thorum 14y ago
I went through the same transition, but only because e-readers were invented.
gatsby 14y ago
Similar story here. I used to own several hundred books but decided to pare down to about 20 over the last few years. Aside from making moving a breeze, the best part is that my favorite books are now conversation pieces for my friends/visitors and I. People come over and immediately dive into my coffee table books about SF's architectural history and will usually mention something about one of the biographies I have on a shelf nearby.
dennisgorelik 14y ago
Even back in 2007 I knew pretty well that books are no better than any other stuff. But it does not end there. Pure information (stored in the cloud or wherever) is also "stuff" and should be constantly cleaned. Keeping pure information does not cost as much as physical stuff, but it still has quite some overhead: you have to index it, back it up, remember how to access it etc.

alok-g 14y ago

A common thing I find many people don't realize is that they accumulate too much stuff, find their home is too small, and then move to a bigger home. They are accumulating stuff often thinking they are saving money (e.g. buy wholesale from Costco), or not throw old stuff that still has some future utility to them. The money they are subconsciously paying just for the space for these things may actually be more than their worth.

taeric 14y ago

I have a hard time getting past the "poor people have more stuff" idea in the beginning. This is akin to thinking that rich people are cleaner. My observation is just that rich people have help. I'd be highly curious to know if there are good numbers into these claims.

gatsby 14y ago
I ran a quick search for articles or data to support pg's idea but couldn't find any. I'm wondering if, on average, "rich" and "poor" people have a similar amount of stuff/junk, but the rich have higher-quality junk and more room to spread it out so it looks cleaner or more minimalist.
- taeric 14y ago
  Pretty much my thoughts. If you ever find anything on this, I'd be interested.
lmm 14y ago
When you're poor you have to be more risk-averse. You can't afford to follow the recommendations of many people here and throw out everything you think you probably won't need, then re-buy the stuff you actually need. Even something trivial like the rotary telephone he mentions - if you ever needed a new phone you could get a new one for $10, which to you or me is nothing, but could be a lot if you're poor. I'd also be interested to see better numbers, but the observation seems to make sense.
- taeric 14y ago
  Apologies for missing this while this article was live. Not sure if you'll see my response. My assertions are A) more that richer people generally just have more than they realize, and B) having help decluttering is huge. It is easy to have the appearance of less stuff when you have a 5 bedroom house. Or, multiple houses. Not so much when you live in a 2 bedroom apartment. Similarly, if you can hire cleaners, it is not shocking that you can stay clean. Even relatively inexpensive cleaners. ($50 every two weeks, for instance. Easily doable for anyone wiling to drop cable. So, not exactly reserved for the super rich.)

durkie 14y ago

my rule to my family at christmas: don't get me anything i can't eat. telling relatives "don't get me anything" never ends up working, so if they're going to get me something, at least it will be delicious.

rodrigoavie 14y ago

Loved this essay. I think pg nailed it when he said that after some point, it's like you don't own stuff anymore. They own you. And the stuff we keep may become serious dependency in our life, which reduces our flexibility and freedom to do new stuff. I just read this article, glad I did in a point of my life where it really makes a huge difference.

damonpace 14y ago

I grew up in the back of a junkyard and watched my father collect "stuff" my entire life. It's a minor mental disorder, irrationally rooted in a fear of having nothing. To my father it was his security blanket. He would look out across the junkyard and see money. Everyone else would just see junk. As long as my father had something in the yard, he felt financially safe. Junk can't fire you and no one was going to steal it. (Only tweekers steal junk) Try stealing a broken down steam roller or a 1 ton gold smelting machine or a 10mb hard drive so big it had wheels. It's pointless. To my father, everything had value, but to everyone else it was just junk. The only people who ever purchased anything were other junk collectors. Watching this as a child and eventually as an adult, I've put the collection of "stuff" on a 10 point scale. 1 being a pure minimalist and 10 being an extreme horder. We all fit somewhere on that scale. I'm probably a 3 or 4. My father is a 10. Understanding where you are on this scale is important to de-cluttering your life. Sometimes value gets set by factors other than price. Value & price are not equally correlated. Value can be translated as functionality, prestige, vanity, security, companionship, etc. People get value of things beyond price and each person sees a different value for each product based on their psychological needs. All PG seems to be saying is to question an objects value before you purchase it. Otherwise, you could end up with a house full of junk that you and no one else will ever use again. In other words...Question everything, including value.

platz 14y ago

http://video.reboot.dk/video/486788/bruce-sterling-reboot-11 http://video.reboot.dk/video/486788/bruce-sterling-reboot-11 "Four variety of items: Beautiful things; emotionally important things; tools, devices and appliances that efficiently perform some useful function; and category four, everything else." http://www.wired.com/beyond_the_beyond/2011/02/transcript-of-reboot-11-speech-by-bruce-sterling-25-6-2009/ http://www.wired.com/beyond_the_beyond/2011/02/transcript-of...

saurabh 14y ago

George Carlin also had something to say about "stuff". http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MvgN5gCuLac http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MvgN5gCuLac

deleted 14y ago

[deleted]

peterjamescain 14y ago

reading that piece made me think of an article that I came across a while ago, about a photographer who went around rural China convincing people to cart all their 'stuff' outside their home and would take a photo of it all...amazing to see their life possessions on display; http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/magazine-19648095 http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/magazine-19648095

wensing 14y ago

I've moved 7 times in 9 years and figure I've discarded, given away or sold over 2,500 lbs worth of stuff. Crazy when I think of it this way. Feels great.

wensing 14y ago

I disagree with his assertion that clutter doesn't bother kids as much as adults. My kids always play more contentedly for longer periods after we've done a big purge or simply organized their toys. I think they get overwhelmed but don't know how to articulate it.

trustfundbaby 14y ago

It really comes to a thing that my folks taught me about money. Don't buy something unless you've wanted it three times --- Larry Wall

krrrh 14y ago

My favorite hack to avoid buying stuff that I really don't need is to photograph it in the store with my phone. I tell myself that I need to look into the product reviews when I get home to my computer, and the photograph is a reminder and documentation of the price and model. If it checks out ill come back and buy it. 95% of the time I've completely forgotten about it when I get home. Also, obligatory Geeorge Carlin bit on stuff: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JLoge6QzcG http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JLoge6QzcG

acchow 14y ago

Do any other software engineers here (who rent) have almost nothing outside clothing, laptop and smartphone?

SeppoErviala 14y ago

Attitudes toward stuff change slowly because you learn them from your parents. My grandmother used to save everything starting from plastic bags, strings, plastic food containers, used nails and screws to electricity, water, heat and money. I suspect it is because when she was young there was a serious lack for everything from food to building materials. I can see the same attitude in my parents except that they hoard a bit more expensive stuff like books, tools, electronics, music containers and furniture. I used to collect electronics, music, comic books and MTG-cards but at some point I just stopped. The need to collect more stuff that I had learned from my elders wasn't useful anymore. It is also apparent that some companies are trying to market and exploit this behaviour for their own gain. I still own too much stuff to fit in my apartment. I find it extremely hard to throw away 'perfectly good' stuff if I feel that it could be useful to someone. Yet it is quite laborious to sell it or to find someone who needs it.

solarbunny 14y ago

If a cluttered desk signs a cluttered mind, of what then is an empty desk a sign? / A. Einstein

mathattack 14y ago

It's interesting how close his comments are to Fight Club. :-) From http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0137523/quotes http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0137523/quotes "Man, I see in fight club the strongest and smartest men who've ever lived. I see all this potential, and I see squandering. God damn it, an entire generation pumping gas, waiting tables; slaves with white collars. Advertising has us chasing cars and clothes, working jobs we hate so we can buy shit we don't need. We're the middle children of history, man. No purpose or place. We have no Great War. No Great Depression. Our Great War's a spiritual war... our Great Depression is our lives. We've all been raised on television to believe that one day we'd all be millionaires, and movie gods, and rock stars. But we won't. And we're slowly learning that fact. And we're very, very pissed off. " Does this mean that the first rule of Hacker News is nobody talks about Hacker News? But seriously, the movie (and Paul's article) hits a nerve because we are indeed consumed by our stuff. There is a carrying cost for everything - every idea in our head, every physical item, every piece of clothes. Similar to what others have said, going abroad helped me realize how little I really need. I remember shipping all these boxes with me, only to not open most of them after I arrived. If I didn't think of something back home in storage over 6 months, would I ever need it? But it's still hard to avoid the weight of possessions.