3 ms·
After reading some of the comments. What do you think about this approach? 1) Woman sets up the date. Place and time. 2) The system sends an invitation to sev
by huherto 14y ago
After reading some of the comments. What do you think about this approach?
1) Woman sets up the date. Place and time.
2) The system sends an invitation to several men until it gets 3-5 positive responses.
3) The woman chooses one of the candidates.
The advantages for the woman is that she controls the terms of the date. She doesn't have to sort thru tons of messages.
The advantages for the man, is that you don't have to spend a lot of time sending invitations to many women. Invitations that are basically ignored
- bti 14y agoSounds like an online version of the TV dating game shows. Would this only apply to the heterosexual crowd?
- huherto 14y agoI don't know how it would work for non-heterosexuals. But I guess they don't have the same problems than heterosexuals. From what I have seen, online dating sucks for men because it is very hard to get noticed. It sucks for women because they get too many choices.
- deleted 14y ago[deleted]
- GVRV 14y agoOne of my mates is actually working on something similar, check out 7pmanywhere.com
- huherto 14y agoNice!Consider it a validation that it may not be a bad idea. And it is seen from the woman's perspective. good! I feel the question phase may slow things because you need another round. Also the fact that she can select another set to choose, may cause her to keep going and not actually make a decision. As far as monetization, I (a man) would definitely pay for each time I am in a selection set. But I need to know that she is going to select one of us.
- billpaetzke 14y agoIf the woman is picking the place, and the man is paying, there is a conflict of interest. Also, women much prefer the man to lead interactions up to and through the first date.