3 ms·
I think that's just a matter of preference on the author's part of which character you are supposed to identify with. Often you are reading the stories from the
by talmand 14y ago
I think that's just a matter of preference on the author's part of which character you are supposed to identify with. Often you are reading the stories from the point of view of Watson who also has to attempt to keep up with Holmes as much as the reader does. You are supposed to relate to Watson and keeping some aspects of the mystery hidden is reflected in this. That way the author can make sure the reader has the opportunity to "figure it out" when they feel is best for the dynamic of the story.
Jack McDevitt speaks of this concept with his Alex Benedict series of books. The first book is from the perspective of the title character but he changes this to the sidekick for the rest of the series. His reasoning for this, from what I recall, is that it wasn't right for the story to be told from the character's perspective but still have to hide certain things from the reader so that certain ideas don't come to mind before they are ready to be presented. The idea is that if the reader figures out the mystery halfway through the story then the rest of the story to be told is ruined.
- b0rsuk 14y agoThen I would blame the story for being too easy to predict. I like stories where there are many loose ends and a variety of outcomes is possible, all making sense.
- talmand 14y agoI enjoy those as well, but if there's a market for a slightly easier mystery story then they'll be written. I suppose another aspect could be the author doesn't want the reader to feel that they are smarter than the hero.