Evidence presupposes a mind capable of making a choice. All these attacks on free will are self-contradictory, free will is an axiom that you can't escape; you

Evidence presupposes a mind capable of making a choice. All these attacks on free will are self-contradictory, free will is an axiom that you can't escape; you must use it even to deny it. Whatever the neuro-scientists are measuring it is not "proving" that free will does not exist or is an illusion. They are demonstrating that our understanding of the relation between the mind and the brain is inadequate and that we don't understand how the subconscious works and its relation to the conscious mind.