4 ms·
I respect Professor Kerr's expertise and the case he cited is still relevant to my original assertion. In the cited case an employee specifically used a another
by jasonzemos 14y ago
I respect Professor Kerr's expertise and the case he cited is still relevant to my original assertion. In the cited case an employee specifically used a another employee's credentials to gain unlawful access. But in this case, Mr. Swartz didn't falsely impersonate anyone by simply using another publicly available IP that he was rightfully permitted to obtain.
- gootdude 14y agoHe changed his MAC address, which is impersonating another device, so in this case it is exactly like the use of 'another employee's credentials'.