2 ms·
The most parsimonious way to interpret the data is that divorce is bad for children. But we can add epicycles to some other secular hedonist theory and make it
by jacoblyles 14y ago
The most parsimonious way to interpret the data is that divorce is bad for children. But we can add epicycles to some other secular hedonist theory and make it fit.
- guard-of-terra 14y agoThe most parsimonious way is also a most uninformative one. For example, you can figure out that being rich and healthy is better than being poor and sick. Also: you say "divorce is bad for children" when a good share of those children were born by mothers who aren't in a marriage and never were (at least not with the father). What about those cases? "divorce" is not applicable to those.