> You really think people do it to get their name there? I’m assuming that’s the reason because I see no other reason for that edit. The editor only made one v

> You really think people do it to get their name there? I’m assuming that’s the reason because I see no other reason for that edit. The editor only made one valid change, “is” to “are”. All the other changes are just there to make the edit look bigger, but don’t actually contribute anything. Do actually look at the changes, they are ridiculous: changing “Pi” to “pi” (why not do it right and change it to “π”?), changing capitalisation of the automatically added placeholder image alt texts (why not remove them or add a meaningful alt text?), linking to Wikipedia articles that have already been linked elsewhere in the text … all in all, the edit seems not like the editor was making an effort at all, and rather like he was making every effort to look busy without having to contribute anything.