> You say it is irrelevant that "MIT runs an open network," but if exaggerated charges are being made, and he is being accused of maliciously hacking into this

> You say it is irrelevant that "MIT runs an open network," but if exaggerated charges are being made, and he is being accused of maliciously hacking into this network, then it is relevant. actually it is irrelevant. the computers in question are JSTOR's, not MIT's. read this: http://www.volokh.com/2013/01/14/aaron-swartz-charges/#comment-767002170 http://www.volokh.com/2013/01/14/aaron-swartz-charges/#comme...