5 ms·
arxiv is not peer-reviewed.
by af3 14y ago
arxiv is not peer-reviewed.
- jlgreco 14y agoPLoS is.
- streptomycin 14y agoAnd it costs thousands of dollars to publish a paper there.
- jlgreco 14y agoYes, and? The price to publish with PLoS is not meant to be a barrier; they will wave the fee if you cannot afford it.
- streptomycin 14y agoNot many people waive the fee currently. If a lot of people did, it would be a huge problem for publishers like PLoS and they would have to change their practices. Assuming that won't happen, then if all publications were open access, there would be a lot more grant money that would have to be spent on publishing fees rather than research. That was the point the guy we originally replied to was making http://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=5052476 http://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=5052476 so citing PLoS as an example isn't really meaningful. It's just an example of precisely the issue he was raising, not a rebuttal.
- jessriedel 14y agoDoesn't matter. Just require that peer-reviewed articles arising from publicly funded research also be posted on the arXiv. This is how it's done anyways in physics.