It'll be interesting to see if this goes anywhere. I believe information should be free, of course, but the law doesn't agree with me. The argument used in the

It'll be interesting to see if this goes anywhere. I believe information should be free, of course, but the law doesn't agree with me. The argument used in the TPB trial for why TPB is guilty and Google isn't is that Google cooperates with the rights holders. It seems like Craigslist could be doing a lot more to stop the use of Craigslist for prostitution: improving the quality of listings with a $5 fee in the erotic service section is just improving the customer's experience. Another source: http://www.chicagotribune.com/news/local/chi-craigslist-lawsuit-dartmar06,0,4199314.story http://www.chicagotribune.com/news/local/chi-craigslist-laws...