3 ms·
Well objectively MIT did play a role, but whether the role was ethically right or wrong is a separate question. So the letter by itself does not admit anything
by asdfologist 14y ago
Well objectively MIT did play a role, but whether the role was ethically right or wrong is a separate question. So the letter by itself does not admit anything, and we'll have to wait for the results of the investigation.
- rhizome 14y agoThreatening someone's life (30+ years in prison) for civilian expropriation of data is certainly a case of bad form, a tenet of ethics. We can argue MIT's significance in this mechanism, but that they aided a bad process is undeniable.