No, no, no. The point of an AG is to act as a first line to determine which cases are worth pursuing and which are not. They absolutely are granted and should e

No, no, no. The point of an AG is to act as a first line to determine which cases are worth pursuing and which are not. They absolutely are granted and should exercise frequently the right to not prosecute! I have had several friends prosecuted for trumped up nonsense that should have been slap-on-the-wrist misdemeanors at the most. I would prefer to see an AG exercise their privilege to not prosecute in cases where, even assuming the facts in the complaint are true, it is unclear that a crime has been committed. Particularly where there is no individual who has been harmed. "Tough on Crime" is a messed up way to operate a justice system. "Fair on Crime" should be the standard we hold our officials to.