4 ms·
$100,000 is nothing, that a single fundraising call to parties interested in the freedom of information cannot collect. I would personally be ready to donate 1
by DoubleMalt 14y ago
$100,000 is nothing, that a single fundraising call to parties interested in the freedom of information cannot collect.
I would personally be ready to donate 100$ immediately.
And then there is the example of the Wikipedia Foundation that seems to do quite well (and could incorporate this effort bringing fund raising and software engineering power to the table)
Whining about $100,000 for such a trove of information is laughable.
- Permit 14y ago>I would personally be ready to donate 100$ immediately. Then you should have no problem paying the fee.
- jlgreco 14y agoThe donation would cover not only his own access, but access of others who may not in a position to donate themselves. It therefore only makes sense that many people would be more willing to donate than pay.
- rprasad 14y agoJSTOR charges an access fee so that it does not have to waste resources on constant fundraising. Fundraising for nonprofits is not like fundraising in SV. Nonprofits can easily spend 50% of their income on fundraising because it is damned expensive to convince people to donate.
- jlgreco 14y agoIn case anybody is interested in a quick comparison to another non-profit with a similar mission, Archive.org spends 2% of their budget on fundraising.