4 ms·

>So yes it is possible to allow free, unrestricted access, JSTOR just decides to only do that to certain IP ranges. If they allowed that with everyone, Aaron wo

by Permit 14y ago

>So yes it is possible to allow free, unrestricted access, JSTOR just decides to only do that to certain IP ranges. If they allowed that with everyone, Aaron wouldn't have to jack his laptop into an unused open closet to pull articles. I'm not talking about hosting or downloading. I'm talking about the digitization of documents and to pay the salaries of their ~200 staff.

daveoh 14y ago
~200 staff? Sounds like an awful lot. And I imagine the front end and backed are kinda done now so after a couple of devs maintaining the system, a sys admin or two, some testers, hr and ceo that leaves ~190 scanning in the documents. Or am I oversimplifying this?
- officemonkey 14y ago
  Not really. Compare their operating budget with Project Gutenberg.
  - paulgb 14y ago
    Project Gutenburg has two part-time employees. http://www.gutenberg.org/wiki/Gutenberg:Project_Gutenberg_Literary_Archive_Foundation http://www.gutenberg.org/wiki/Gutenberg:Project_Gutenberg_Li...
    - officemonkey 14y ago
      Well, there you go.
- orionblastar 14y ago
  Sort of like Wal-Mart having 300 employees per store and only two of them on checkout lines.
jacquesm 14y ago
So, you're saying that the final versions of the paper are not available in digital form pre-press? That's not meshing with what I know about how academic publishing works. If jstor is digitizing papers from before the pdf era then that's fine but those papers produced today are all available in digital format long before they get to jstor.
orionblastar 14y ago
Only if you can justify why you need ~200 staff in the digital age when most if not all research papers are made in electronic format and don't need to be digitized. What do they do as well, watch Youtube videos most of the time and then scan in those rare research papers that are submitted in hardcopy format? The 1% of submissions that are actually in hardcopy and not RTF, DOC, PDF, ePub, Mobi ect formats?

by Permit 14y ago

daveoh 14y ago

~200 staff? Sounds like an awful lot. And I imagine the front end and backed are kinda done now so after a couple of devs maintaining the system, a sys admin or two, some testers, hr and ceo that leaves ~190 scanning in the documents. Or am I oversimplifying this?

officemonkey 14y ago
Not really. Compare their operating budget with Project Gutenberg.
- paulgb 14y ago
  Project Gutenburg has two part-time employees. http://www.gutenberg.org/wiki/Gutenberg:Project_Gutenberg_Literary_Archive_Foundation http://www.gutenberg.org/wiki/Gutenberg:Project_Gutenberg_Li...
  - officemonkey 14y ago
    Well, there you go.
orionblastar 14y ago
Sort of like Wal-Mart having 300 employees per store and only two of them on checkout lines.

jacquesm 14y ago

So, you're saying that the final versions of the paper are not available in digital form pre-press? That's not meshing with what I know about how academic publishing works. If jstor is digitizing papers from before the pdf era then that's fine but those papers produced today are all available in digital format long before they get to jstor.

orionblastar 14y ago

Only if you can justify why you need ~200 staff in the digital age when most if not all research papers are made in electronic format and don't need to be digitized. What do they do as well, watch Youtube videos most of the time and then scan in those rare research papers that are submitted in hardcopy format? The 1% of submissions that are actually in hardcopy and not RTF, DOC, PDF, ePub, Mobi ect formats?