5 ms·

This particular case makes sense, it's the same as not hiring someone because they are definitely going to have to quit relatively soon, especially if they know

This particular case makes sense, it's the same as not hiring someone because they are definitely going to have to quit relatively soon, especially if they knowingly withheld that information. However, the article and its title strongly suggest that if he were an ex-convict, they would have cut him out of the process with no second thoughts. Of course all ex-cons are subhuman murderous animals! That's what I'm really annoyed about, so maybe this situation really just doesn't fit, but I still felt it had to be said.

Tichy 18y ago
When do you know that somebody can be trusted again? Serious question - I am not sure about the best way to go about it. A spontaneous feeling would be that maybe someone should earn the trust somehow, so I wouldn't necessarily simply put them in a position where they can do the same things they did before. (Like not employing child abusers in child care). Anyway, it is hard to tell without knowing more about the person in question.
- cellis 18y ago
  Trust: hard to earn, easy to lose and impossible to get back.
  - wynand 18y ago
    That's a problem with our society. One can only have a morally superior attitude that denies the restoration of trust if you imagine that you'll never make a mistake.