4 ms·
Who are you referring to, exactly? The federal prosecutors? The division head? The attorney general? How do you plan to identify the parties bent on indicting
by doktrin 14y ago
Who are you referring to, exactly?
The federal prosecutors? The division head? The attorney general?
How do you plan to identify the parties bent on indicting him? You certainly can't assume the prosecutors took this on as some sort of personal crusade.
Assuming you can identify the individuals most responsible, what do you plan to do to punish them for their actions? The implication of getting "names and faces" out in the public domain is potentially serious.
I've seen this sentiment echoed variously up and down this thread, and it is scary. Inaction is not the appropriate response here, but neither is the public stoning you appear to be proposing.
- monsterix 14y agoHow is knowing their names and faces the same as public stoning, sir? I just don't understand what emotion led you to conclude that? We should always know who said what in the case. It's important to know who led the indictment, who pushed a criminal case instead of a civil suit and so on...