I don't follow. Most 'facts' are considered facts because there is overwhelming data in support of their accuracy. I can't actually think about a 'fact' that

I don't follow. Most 'facts' are considered facts because there is overwhelming data in support of their accuracy. I can't actually think about a 'fact' that isn't based on such study outside what are considered fundamental laws (which often time are discovered based on data collection). For a fact to exist without massive supporting evidence via test data is outside the realm of science which doesn't make it much of a fact in my opinion.