3 ms·
It's likely due to confirmation bias, but it seems that almost every bitcoin company has some (usually careless or inexcusable) gap in their security...
by mattlong 14y ago
It's likely due to confirmation bias, but it seems that almost every bitcoin company has some (usually careless or inexcusable) gap in their security...
- danielweber 14y agoBack when I cared about bitcoin, I'd go look at their websites for vulnerabilities and usually find them. Then I would tell them. They never replied but did fix them.
- Benferhat 14y agoWhat made you stop caring?
- danielweber 14y agoI built a simple program to transfer money between two of my wallets, and .01 bitcoin (a substantial fraction of my bitcoin wealth) disappeared as a transaction cost. I asked around and was told "oh, yeah, they changed the defaults recently so there is always a transaction cost, you should pay closer attention to mailing list X, it's more up-to-date than the API documentation." I decided I didn't like dealing with something where I had to assume the fine print was out to screw me and walked away. I have other things to do with my life. (I probably am misremembering a few details of something that took place a few years ago.)
- Benferhat 14y agoYes, fuck transaction costs! I understand why we have them, though.