>Everything else seems to be some stuff they made up. How in the world do you get from point A (a BS summary in the article) to point B (that they made the con

>Everything else seems to be some stuff they made up. How in the world do you get from point A (a BS summary in the article) to point B (that they made the conclusion in the paper up) in this line of reasoning? Read the freaking original article, not the news bite.