I missed your "sic" the first time I read your comment, so I feel like it's worth emphasising: yes, space.com did manage to mix up protons and photons in the sa

I missed your "sic" the first time I read your comment, so I feel like it's worth emphasising: yes, space.com did manage to mix up protons and photons in the same article. Not sure if that's evidence of bad writing or bad editing, but either way it's embarrassing from a science website of all places.