3 ms·
If you follow the issue tracker the octane boost they've chosen is the exception rather than the rule. Other benchmarking tools indicate worse performance. Hav
by hayksaakian 14y ago
If you follow the issue tracker the octane boost they've chosen is the exception rather than the rule. Other benchmarking tools indicate worse performance.
Having just ran browsermark on both browsers, new chrome got ~100 pts better.
- josteink 14y agoLooks like I'll stick to stock (AOSP) browser then. I'm not going to call the Galaxy Nexus a resource-constrained device but putting Chrome on it sure makes it feel like one, and I like my device as snappy as they come.
- hayksaakian 14y agoI would use it, but I consider it depricated at this point. I don't want to get my hopes up using the AOSP browser to face the crushing reality that is chrome.
- graue 14y agoHave you tried Firefox? It's pretty darn fast on my Galaxy Nexus.
- josteink 14y agoLast time I tried it my main complaint was startup-time. The stock browser started instantly, while Firefox has a annoying 3-4 second delay before it started loading things. Has that improved significantly lately?
- graue 14y agoI don't remember that ever happening. How long ago did you try it? Comparing the two now, Firefox seems on par with Browser for app startup and slightly quicker to display pages.