2 ms·
Not exactly, I didn't mean that what you think is productive should be thrown out, no need to throw anything. What I meant, is that your cycle does not accumula
by rikacomet 14y ago
Not exactly, I didn't mean that what you think is productive should be thrown out, no need to throw anything. What I meant, is that your cycle does not accumulate the entirety of this thing called life.
- masukomi 14y agono? Yes there's the edge case that isn't covered, of sacrificing the one for the many, but that's a dangerous slope to try and codify. Other than that, how does it not? At each step of your life "now" you attempt to do something that benefits someone's life (probably yours) and doesn't harm anyone. Yes, there are other ways of approaching life (most people do stuff that doesn't really make anyone's life better most of the time).... but would you really argue that those are paths you should strive to follow? As a guideline, I think it's pretty good, and other than the edge case mentioned above, I can't think of an instance where it isn't the best path to follow. I really would like to hear a good counterargument / flow that one should follow instead. It's not meant to encompass all the ways people live. It's intended to be a guide as to how to proceed.