3 ms·
I'm still a fan of bitbucket. While I like Github if I wanted to open source some software, I like bitbucket for hosting my private repos. I can use this for
by kyrra 14y ago
I'm still a fan of bitbucket. While I like Github if I wanted to open source some software, I like bitbucket for hosting my private repos. I can use this for backup for any project I'm working on and not worry about it. This could be for backing up config files (/etc/) on my linux box, or some project I'm wipping up that I don't really want to share with the world.
While Github is nice for its social and discovery aspect, if I just want code hosting, Bitbucket are a great solution.
Also, for those large companies that want to run their software internally, Bitbucket's solution is quite a bit cheaper than Github. I haven't had to setup either (or use either), but the pricing for Bitbucket makes it very appealing.
[1] http://www.atlassian.com/software/stash/pricing http://www.atlassian.com/software/stash/pricing
[2] https://enterprise.github.com/pricing https://enterprise.github.com/pricing
- ConstantineXVI 14y agoNote that Stash isn't the same product as Bitbucket; and doesn't include a bug tracker or wiki.
- anton_gogolev 14y agoThere's also HgLab ( http://hglabhq.com http://hglabhq.com )
- kyrra 14y agoStash is Git, hglab is Mercurial I would say Gitorious[1] would be a closer comparison to Stash. [1] https://gitorious.org/ https://gitorious.org/
- Osiris 14y agoI use BitBucket for the same thing. In the old days I hosted my own SVN server but now I've migrated my projects to Git and pushed them up to BitBucket. They are private repos that only I use but it's awesome to have a backup as well as being able to push from my machine and pull down from my server for deployments. Free hosting for private repos is really great, and it ties in nicely with SourceTree.