I realize this is quite off the main topic, but I thought it was interesting and worth passing on. If you really think that "four different kinds of equality"

I realize this is quite off the main topic, but I thought it was interesting and worth passing on. If you really think that "four different kinds of equality" in Common Lisp is a wart, then I recommend that you read "The Best of Intentions" (http://www.nhplace.com/kent/PS/EQUAL.html http://www.nhplace.com/kent/PS/EQUAL.html) by Kent Pitman. The article explains why that situation is quite intentional, and why it is very rational, and why it is in fact ill-advised to expect a single meaning for "equal" ... or, in fact, other "obvious" concepts like "copy" ... to be sufficient. That article was one of the many over the years that helped me refine the way I think about programming and programming languages.