3 ms·
Let's translate it to C: C99 is C. C++0x is C++. C++ is C. Clang is C99. Do all the lines seem correct?
by vseloved 14y ago
Let's translate it to C:
C99 is C.
C++0x is C++.
C++ is C.
Clang is C99.
Do all the lines seem correct?
- qu4z-2 14y agoI disagree with your translation. I admit that "SBCL is Common Lisp" is a stretch, but no more than your original "Racket is Scheme". How about instead: LISP 1.5 is like C Common Lisp is like C++ Scheme is like Objective-C (ignoring all the other Lisp dialects that have fallen by the wayside: Maclisp, Interlisp, ZetaLisp)
- vseloved 14y agoHere's a more detailed answer: http://lisp-univ-etc.blogspot.com/2013/01/common-lisp-is-just-lisp.html http://lisp-univ-etc.blogspot.com/2013/01/common-lisp-is-jus... I also agree, that Racket is not Scheme, it's a new language. But I stand, that Common Lisp is still a Lisp. Lisp 1.5 would be BCPL or B :) (Why? Because C is in active use, while Lisp 1.5 isn't, so your analogy isn't quite correct)
- deleted 14y ago[deleted]