3 ms·
> most people just don't want beats coming at them that fast. I'm sure people used to say this about Rock & Roll, or Jazz. The revolution in speed is probably
by r0s 14y ago
> most people just don't want beats coming at them that fast.
I'm sure people used to say this about Rock & Roll, or Jazz. The revolution in speed is probably just a decade away, judging by past acceptance.
I want increasing information content ad nausium, because it's simply a pale shadow of real experience. When we actually achieve comparable bandwidth with real life, we'll talk. The day the holodeck is seamlessly integrated in our lives is the day we can discuss limits, but by then it may not matter.
- anigbrowl 14y agoThe revolution in speed is probably just a decade away, judging by past acceptance. I wouldn't be so sure of that. This is about 15 years old: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=r0-BWdABmhY http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=r0-BWdABmhY
- __david__ 14y agoOr Moby's Thousand [1,2], released 20 years ago. [1] https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=F9Ld-3YZ8bQ https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=F9Ld-3YZ8bQ [2] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/I_Feel_It/Thousand https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/I_Feel_It/Thousand
- SideburnsOfDoom 14y agoBut oddly, if you have listened to enough techno, you may find that there is often more informational content in a 120bpm track than a 220bpm track. If a 4-bar bar is shorter, you can put fewer notes, fewer sounds, fewer subtleties of any kind in it.With the 220bpm gabba, there's no room for much besides the machine-gun beats.