If this is what passes for an apology from Ars Technica for wrongly reporting on this story from the start, when I believe it claimed that this was free Photosh

If this is what passes for an apology from Ars Technica for wrongly reporting on this story from the start, when I believe it claimed that this was free Photoshop for the masses, it is a weak apology. A news organisation should stand behind its stories with its reputation and sadly Ars believes it has little reputation.