4 ms·
That's why its being open source is relevant. Paranoid folks like us set up a private network locally or on any number of our own physically secure servers. It
by Benferhat 14y ago
That's why its being open source is relevant. Paranoid folks like us set up a private network locally or on any number of our own physically secure servers.
It's also an interesting question:
How comfortable do we feel relying upon the "principle of least authority" long-term in a mixed-trust environment? i.e., a p2p-style Tahoe-LAFS grid, or deploying it privately using a commercial vendor like Amazon S3 (either directly or through Dropbox for free), on our own servers, and everything in between.
You might not trust companies from certain countries with your data, and you shouldn't be forced to in order to store it* in the cloud*.
[0] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Principle_of_Least_Authority https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Principle_of_Least_Authority
- n0on3 14y ago"[…] You might not trust Companies with your data either, and you shouldn't be forced to in order to store it in the cloud". That is exactly our goal: we don't like to be forced to trust companies for the security of data, so we are developing a service where users actually don't have to trust even us… although some trust in the encryption algorithms used will be required, given that you can see the implementation of course.
- Benferhat 14y agoSo how do you differentiate your service from Least Authority [0]? [0] https://leastauthority.com/ https://leastauthority.com/