3 ms·
Yes but the fiscally prudent thing to do would have been to wait 4-5 years for them to need replacement then replace them with something else. They were just un
by willyt 14y ago
Yes but the fiscally prudent thing to do would have been to wait 4-5 years for them to need replacement then replace them with something else. They were just unpopular and prone to fare dodging not dangerous. There were a few reports of cyclists being killed, but for that money. You could have saved more lives by, say, installing platform edge doors in busy tube stations.
Edit: And I dont think it was ever conclusivly shown that they actually killed more cyclists per mile than normal buses.