4 ms·
> faster compiled languages Lisp is a compiled language. For that matter, it's a damn fast one, too. The Lisp implementation of PCREs are actually faster than
by chimeracoder 14y ago
> faster compiled languages
Lisp is a compiled language.
For that matter, it's a damn fast one, too. The Lisp implementation of PCREs are actually faster than Perl's, by some benchmarks.
I don't want to start a tangent about benchmarks and their relevance, but it's clear that Lisp performance isn't a limiting factor.
- fusiongyro 14y agoWhenever Lisp's history is mentioned we get another free replay of this classic "who's on first" bit: A: Lisp didn't succeed in part because it was slow B: What? Lisp isn't slow! Do you see the problem? No, it isn't slow now, but it was slow and a resource hog and that is a legitimate variable that may have negatively affected uptake during key points in its history. Times have changed, implementations have improved, resources have become less scarce, but the past is still the past.
- lazyjones 14y agoC is still faster at common tasks and back then, code from readily available C and Pascal compilers was much faster than CMUCL or ELISP (both had a bytecode interpreter only AFAIR). My point is that in the 80s and 90s, computers were much slower and a factor of 2 was a big deal then, especially for professional developers who had to write well-performing applications, though nowdays a good language is "fast enough" if it's only half as fast as C.
- lispm 14y agocmucl has native code generation for a VERY long time.