3 ms·
I certainly understand the point of "crowd funding". > If you expect projects to be on time you couldn’t have picked a worse thing than Kickstarter... Take the
by peterhajas 14y ago
I certainly understand the point of "crowd funding".
> If you expect projects to be on time you couldn’t have picked a worse thing than Kickstarter... Take the Double Fine Adventure: It will completely overshoot the estimated delivery date by a long, long time
This is a problem with estimation. It's way worse to overshoot a delivery time than deliver before it. This is poor project planning. If I would have known this, I perhaps would not have backed Double Fine Adventures.
> At Kickstarter you give money to something that might or might not work out in the end, but that will most definitely overshoot its estimated delivery date
I disagree fundamentally. If a project is funded, then it is funded. The backer rewards aren't qualified with "if we're successful". They're "you will get ___".
> if it doesn’t it’s a fluke.
If I didn't get my backer reward, then they stole from me. If I do, and I get it late, then they poorly managed their delivery date.
- manuelflara 14y ago>> if it doesn’t it’s a fluke. >If I didn't get my backer reward, then they stole from me. http://www.kickstarter.com/blog/kickstarter-is-not-a-store http://www.kickstarter.com/blog/kickstarter-is-not-a-store
- arrrg 14y agoIf you see it like that, then don’t use Kickstarter. Nobody forces you to. But do not force others to share your view. I think Kickstarter is awesome.