3 ms·
If you guys looked at several years ago, you should probably say "was" awful, as opposed to "is". I haven't followed for years... but even circa 2007 and 2008
by erdevs 14y ago
If you guys looked at several years ago, you should probably say "was" awful, as opposed to "is".
I haven't followed for years... but even circa 2007 and 2008 it had undergone huge rewrites from the old 90s and early 2000s nastiness with their simulation layer, scripting hooks, and high level classes. Was moving to a much cleaner componentized system with much better patterns throughout.
Or, maybe the codebase has actually gotten worse since 2006+, when it was shaping up pretty nicely. That could well be, I don't know. But such comments would be higher value if you at least reference approximate timeframe, as this product has been around in various forms for 10+ years, if I recall correctly.