3 ms·
There is a command line client too, and the entire website is open source (links at bottom.) If you're worried about not trusting anyone, then you would need t
by qixxiq 14y ago
There is a command line client too, and the entire website is open source (links at bottom.)
If you're worried about not trusting anyone, then you would need to set up your own solution - but for most people thats completely out of their league. This is intended for people who would be typing their master password in different websites, and now instead only need to type their master password into one.
I can't argue against the problem of only having one password, but the small set never worked for me. I have a couple plans to integrate password migration into password.ly.
- smutticus 14y ago> and the entire website is open source (links at bottom.) How do I know the code released for review is actually the code they're running on their server? There is no way they can adequately prove this to me.
- jrogers65 14y agoSimple solution is to self-host it.
- tinco 14y agoI understand your point, I've thought about launching a site like this too, but the single host problem is just too big of a flaw. It has nothing to do with trusting anyone, if a service like this should grow out of obscurity it would naturally become a target for hackers, just like the Bitcoin exchanges did for example. There is almost no protecting against this, the attack vectors are endless, and the bounty could be very large.