3 ms·
> You don't even have to know/touch html/css. Most people here know and prefer html/css to magic. > You also have an automated generated page (that contains a
by atomical 14y ago
> You don't even have to know/touch html/css.
Most people here know and prefer html/css to magic.
> You also have an automated generated page (that contains all of your js files or 1 big file if is min)
Easy with Rails. A lot of backbone apps are running on rails.
- sycren 14y agoI see lots of backbone app tutorials with Sinatra, would you suggest that Rails is better?
- atomical 14y agoI don't know whether it's better or not. But I think Rails is good enough and has a lot of advanced functionality.
- ttty 14y agoWell, why in the world you would want to do the same thing 2 or more and to check in every single browser to know it's pixel perfect? This is the HTM+CSS way. In Qooxdoo, it's pixel perfect in every browser, that's the difference. If you make a view for a component with HTML+CSS you should take care of each browser. Ps. I really think it's a bad idea coupling your client side to the server side. Imagine you want to go to node.js someday..?