3 ms·
No I didn't. The naming conventions for this instruction set are a bit of a mess [0], with every company trying to stick their brand in the middle of it. No won
by wildranter 14y ago
No I didn't. The naming conventions for this instruction set are a bit of a mess [0], with every company trying to stick their brand in the middle of it. No wonder people get confused on this. Thanks for pointing that out.
[0] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/X86-64 http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/X86-64
- X-Istence 14y agoAMD was the first to market with AMD64 ... no surprise that they got to slap their brand on it.
- jeltz 14y agoJust like Intel named their competing 64 bit architecture Intel Itanium. The AMD64 architecture won and Intel decided to license it.
- potkor 14y agoIn practice Itanium only competed with the existing 64-bit architectures from the Unix vendors. Many of whom got suckered into dropping their own stuff and moving onto Itanium, and got wiped out because of the very late & underperforming Itanium chips (frequently called "Itanic")...