I thought it was surrounding the DMV definition for "Person" from the DMV code and not corporation personhood. The defendant did have a thing against personhoo

I thought it was surrounding the DMV definition for "Person" from the DMV code and not corporation personhood. The defendant did have a thing against personhood but seems the defense was that signs were legally vague in accordance to the DMVs definition of person. 470. "Person" includes a natural person, firm, copartnership, association, limited liability company, or corporation. http://dmv.ca.gov/pubs/vctop/d01/vc470.htm http://dmv.ca.gov/pubs/vctop/d01/vc470.htm