3 ms·
This article is total overgeneralizing scientifically embarrassing bullshit. Not one single argument actually makes sense. Not even the spelling one. As a latin
by mahesh_rm 14y ago
This article is total overgeneralizing scientifically embarrassing bullshit. Not one single argument actually makes sense. Not even the spelling one. As a latin-cultivated person I can tell you: extrovert is THE correct spelling. Introvert, which is the opposite, comes from intra (inside) + versum (directed). It is intrOvert, as it is extrOvert. Second, there is no scientific evidence suggesting extroverts are less creative than introverts. All the other arguments are so ridicule and coming from gross scientific misinterpretations, that it is actually not even possible to bring them into consideration.
- calinet6 14y ago"This article is total overgeneralizing scientifically embarrassing bullshit." Ex-freaking-zactly! It's complete and utter bullshit written by a socially-inept person who should be ashamed of this borderline racist-level propaganda against extroverts. I'm happy to make some generalizations in return. Maybe the reason this person needs to blame extroverts is because nobody wants to work with them in the first place. Maybe they're actually not an introvert, but an introverted sociopath incapable of feeling empathy for others and thus unable to relate to them on any level whatsoever. Just maybe. Solid gold bullshit.
- alanctgardner2 14y agoThe latin thing really got me too; the author constantly comes across as inconsiderate and elitist. He knows best, and being introverted is best. Case closed. Everything else is just him showing off how smart he is, and how he can totally do things better than people who are succeeding, but he doesn't want to because it might involve interpersonal communication.