4 ms·
Very nice. I find crowd-sourced anything very compelling. Is there any methodology for getting users? Is there some reliable way to differentiate between "I ha
by wwwtyro 14y ago
Very nice.
I find crowd-sourced anything very compelling. Is there any methodology for getting users? Is there some reliable way to differentiate between "I haven't yet tried hard enough to get users," and "I'm pretty confident this is simply not going to catch on"?
- kylebragger 14y agoThanks. Me too. I'm fortunate to be in a position where I can run this forever whether or not it achieves meaningful scale. It's built for me (though it already has resonated with many). As far as growth is concerned, it's already growing organically on its own and for the time being that's satisfactory to me. I haven't get invested serious resources in growth. Then again, I managed to grow my last product to > 50,000 users purely through and invitation model, with almost nothing spent on marketing. There's a pretty compelling reason IMO to want to build sets together, and I think a lot of the same invite driven mechanics will apply. That being said, I'm more focused on just building a great product that I use daily.
- deleted 14y ago[deleted]
- kylebragger 14y agoAlso, I think that ~3 months of stagnation, low engagement, lots of "testing this out" sets, I should have a pretty good sense that I'm not going about this in a way that is interesting to others. (But as long as it is to me, then I'm happy.)