4 ms·
The 10-second formulation: "these sites will email your password, meaning it can be used to compromise your account." That's precise, short, and easily underst
by runako 14y ago
The 10-second formulation: "these sites will email your password, meaning it can be used to compromise your account."
That's precise, short, and easily understandable. It's also verifiable. I'm sure you can come up with something that hits those marks just as quickly. It's really not hard, which makes the sloppiness of this site's claims more annoying.
- marshray 14y agoWith your formulation, a site can get itself off of the offender list by not sending certain emails. Yet in most of the password data breaches we've seen in the last year, the email was not actually the method by which the stored credentials were leaked. A simple web search https://www.google.com/q=plain+text+password+breach https://www.google.com/q=plain+text+password+breach shows that plaintext (or improper hashing) of database-stored credentials is probably a more common factor. Your formulation is "precise, short, and easily understandable" but it's also wrong. You're making the mistake of measuring the thing that's easiest to measure rather that the thing that's most important to improve.