2 ms·
Thank you for being reasonable in your response, and I'm glad that you've taken the comment to heart. I agree with another commenter: I think this letter would
by jspthrowaway2 14y ago
Thank you for being reasonable in your response, and I'm glad that you've taken the comment to heart.
I agree with another commenter: I think this letter would have been better left closed. I had the privilege of meeting Ray Kurzweil last year in New York at an intimate talk (he was annoyed he had to cut his preso down to an hour), and he's a genuinely smart guy and a real pleasure to talk with. That being said, he has some genuinely bananas-crazy ideas, and they might work or they might not. I'm happy to see him try on the off chance they will, though, and I'm glad Google is paying him to explore some.
I know a lot about Paxos after spending years studying it and its implementations, but I'm not going to openly and publicly criticize Mike Burrows for his work on Google's Chubby. He knows a lot of things that I don't, and I'm smart enough to realize that. I'm more game to learn from his work than criticize Google for hiring him. I do take who a person is into account when thinking about their body of work, but only in the positive.
That's where I'm coming from. You care about all of us working together and succeeding, yet try to divide with your letter, so it's a bit strange. That's all.
- iandanforth 14y agoI've edited the letter a bit with a note of the help I got from HN. Do you still feel it is divisive?