3 ms·
Agree. The arguments put forth are nothing but romantic appeals to human supremacy. First, that you can't have intelligence without meat. Second, that you can't
by warmfuzzykitten 14y ago
Agree. The arguments put forth are nothing but romantic appeals to human supremacy. First, that you can't have intelligence without meat. Second, that you can't have intelligence unless it learns by the same bumbling process that humans use. (An assertion that early intelligent behavior is inversely proportional to later intelligent behavior.) Third, "build a body"? Really? Please email your recipe for building a body that will exhibit intelligence without Darwinian selection across the entire universe to...I don't know...quack.com.