You say that this blog article would be improved if he had quantified the success rate of his observations, and you say claim this would constitute "proof" of t

You say that this blog article would be improved if he had quantified the success rate of his observations, and you say claim this would constitute "proof" of the goodness of his post. Where's your proof that quantified metrics would make the post any better, or that indeed such quantified metrics would even constitute such "proof"? Just giving you a hard time :)