3 ms·
Because it's inflammatory, and patently nonsense. By any non-mad definition, Sweden is not a banana republic. Saying so prejudices the points made (though frank
by archgrove 14y ago
Because it's inflammatory, and patently nonsense. By any non-mad definition, Sweden is not a banana republic. Saying so prejudices the points made (though frankly, the entire "article" is 1 sided hyperbole).
- pyre 14y ago| By any non-mad definition, Sweden is not a | banana republic This can't be a kangaroo court! We're not in Australia, so there are no kangaroos here!</sarcasm> The prefix "Banana Republic Justice" can also be seen as claiming that Sweden handed out banana republic-style justice in this case, not that Sweden is a banana republic.
- bluedanieru 14y agoBut, it's in the title. It shouldn't have been edited out.