4 ms·
Could ``Bicholim Conflict'' have been a potential Mountweazel for Wikipedia: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fictitious_entry https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ficti
by brini 14y ago
Could ``Bicholim Conflict'' have been a potential Mountweazel for Wikipedia:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fictitious_entry https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fictitious_entry
- deleted 14y ago[deleted]
- Apocryphon 14y agoI don't see why it would have been created for that purpose, there are dozens, if not hundreds, of kudzu sites scraping Wikipedia and cloning its articles as early as 2005: http://users.erols.com/mwhite28/wikiwoo3.htm#Bastard http://users.erols.com/mwhite28/wikiwoo3.htm#Bastard
- greenyoda 14y agoWhy would anyone create a "copyright trap" for an encyclopedia whose work is free to copy?