4 ms·
I am sorry, there was no 'hubris' at all. You obviously misunderstood my comment along with other few not very bright people. Recently I had to conduct a number
by dakimov 14y ago
I am sorry, there was no 'hubris' at all. You obviously misunderstood my comment along with other few not very bright people. Recently I had to conduct a number of job interviews on C/C++, and then I came across this article, and a thought came to my mind that great people cannot be measured with a scale of mediocrity, and that the mainstream in every field of human knowledge is used to be very focused on non-essential detail. Sapienti sat, but in your case it is the reversal.
- jacquesm 14y agoDo you have this a lot, that other, not very bright people misunderstand you?
- dakimov 14y agoLooking at your responses, I see you are a guy with very straightforward stereotypic thinking, you are aggressive, and your little taunt is also childishly primitive and straightforward. Does it make sense to talk to you at all? So the answer is 'no', of course, I do not 'have this a lot', as I usually simply ignore this kind of people, but unfortunately there is an option to downvote a comment for the benefit of the stupid.
- mturmon 14y agoI understand where you're coming from now. I think your delivery needed work -- it relied too much on your own mental context. Since the OP was critical of K&R, it made sense to interpret your remark in that context rather than the one you mention.