3 ms·
"Java IDEs really get the job done" That is utterly misleading. Java IDEs really get the Java job done. And, sadly, Java is a language of such an incredible
by martinced 14y ago
"Java IDEs really get the job done"
That is utterly misleading. Java IDEs really get the Java job done. And, sadly, Java is a language of such an incredible verboseness and containing so many idiosynchrasies that it takes a lot of code to do things. And IDEs do certainly excel at this.
But you have to realize that a lot of the IDEs' functionalities when it comes to Java are really just work around Java's failures.
So, yes, I can fire IDEA and it shall allow me "easily" work around a 100 000 LOC codebase.
But if I can write the same program in 30 000 LOC of Go or 10 000 LOC of a Lisp dialect I think that there's still a jury out there trying to determine if Java IDEs are really that great.
So I don't doubt that IDEA / Eclipse is helping you in your Java + ORM + XML hell but there are other ways to develop applications. Mind you: it's a huge world out there and despite your beloved IDEs being so great there are still people not programming in Java.
Also the IDEs tend to suck quite a lot when we're talking about "non-Java JVM languages".
Btw I'm using IntelliJ since so long I don't remember if it was version 3 or 4 and I just bought version 12.
--
"Patterns means I have run out of language"